Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Government's 1.8% figure 'hides true size' of cuts

  • 1 Comment

Councils’ “spending power” will fall by more than three times the amount the government has claimed it will, according to new analysis

Figures published by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy show the figure will fall by 6% in 2015-16. Local government minister Kris Hopkins said today that it would fall by 1.8%.

Cipfa’s analysis uses a different definition of “spending power” to that used by the government. Its analysis does not count ringfenced grants or the better care fund, much of which is used to fund NHS services. Cipfa argues this should not be counted because it is outside councils’ control.

Its analysis also shows central government funding to local government will be cut by 14.6% in 2015-16.

Cipfa found spending cuts were “falling most heavily upon areas of the greatest need”. The figure would fall by 8% in London and 7.8% in the north east, it said, compared to just 3.4% in the south east.

Rob Whiteman, chief executive of Cipfa, said: “The difference between what has been presented today by the government and the actual cash figures for cuts to local councils is stark.

“It demonstrates why we urgently need transparency about government funding instead of this continued conflation and inflation spending which hides the true size and scope of the cuts many local authorities face.”

Mr Whiteman said the government’s decision to include the better care fund towards its spending power calculation was “seriously distorting” the figures.

“Once you peer behind the opaque measurement of funding used today, you see that the disparity of impact across the country and between different types of authority is significant and needs to be considered carefully by policymakers,” he said.

The LGA has also criticised the government’s use of figures.

Analysis by the organisation has found that the 1.8% cut to councils’ “spending power” translates into an 8.8% cut to government grant.

The LGA claimed councils would have to save £2.6bn next year.

Its analysis found cuts to core government grants totalled 40% since 2010, and that councils had made savings worth £20bn in that period.

David Sparks (Lab), chair of the LGA, said: “Today’s settlement confirms the huge financial challenge local services now face.

“It is individuals who have paid the price of funding reductions, whether it is through seeing their local library close, roads deteriorate or support for young people and families scaled back.

“If the services which underpin people’s daily lives are to survive the next few years then it will be essential that this and the next government commit to a much faster and bolder approach to English devolution… For some areas it’s now devolution or bust.”

Mr Hopkins said the cuts announced in today’s local government finance settlement were “lower than last year and one of the lowest levels of reduction under this government”.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Lies, damn lies and Kris Hopkins. Unashamed financial gerrymandering. It is one thing to oblige local government to shoulder more than their fair share of cuts but it takes a particularly nasty government to disproportionately load cuts on areas with the highest scores of deprivation. It is said that Piffles fancies playing Scrooge who of course goes through a process of redemption. The real scenario however is that the ghost of Town Halls future fleas in terror, Bob Cratchit has his wages frozen indefinitely and Tiny Tim is forced into an unpaid DCLG internship!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.