Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ABOLITION OF CLEVELAND - FULL TEXT OF WRITTEN ANSWER: PART I

  • Comment
In a written Parliamentary Answer to a question from Michael Bates MP (Langbaurgh), Mr Gummer told the House of Com...
In a written Parliamentary Answer to a question from Michael Bates MP (Langbaurgh), Mr Gummer told the House of Commons:

'I have today written to Sir John Banham, chairman of the Local Government Commission, giving my decisions on the Commission's recommendations for Cleveland as set out in its report, `Final recommendations on the future local government of Cleveland and Durham'.

'After considering the commission's recommendations and the representations made, I have concluded that effective and convenient local government in Cleveland would be achieved by abolishing Cleveland County Council and establishing four unitary authorities for the area (commission recommendation 1), and that this would reflect the identities and interests of local people.

'I have accepted in principle that the County of Cleveland should be abolished, but I shall defer a final decision until I have reached decisions on the Commission's forthcoming recommendations for Durham and North Yorkshire. The remaining recommendations for Cleveland have been accepted as submitted, except that I am still considering the proposal that I direct the Commission to undertake a further parish review.

'In agreeing with the establishment of unitary authorities based on existing districts, I have given careful consideration to representations which I received about the implications for those services and functions currently performed on a wider basis. My decision is based on a presumption that the authorities which are to become unitary will work together to plan for these services and functions, and will forge working links with other bodies such as health authorities. - see full text II, on LGC Net.
  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.