Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ABOLITION OF CLEVELAND: FULL TEXT OF WRITTEN ANSWER: PART II

  • Comment
'The boundaries of the four proposed unitary authorities, which I intend to establish in April 1995, correspond to ...
'The boundaries of the four proposed unitary authorities, which I intend to establish in April 1995, correspond to those of the existing district councils.

Where the boundaries of unitary authorities and existing authorities coincide in this way I propose as a general rule to consult the local authorities concerned about the desirability of holding elections for the whole council in the May preceding the 1 April reorganisation date.

'Accordingly I am now consulting the majority and minority groups on each district council, and Cleveland County council, to seek their views about whether or not elections should be held in May 1994. I will make a further announcement about the outcome of that consultation.

'An order giving effect to the Commission's recommendations for Cleveland, with the aforementioned modifications, will be laid before the House in due course. A copy of my letter to Sir John Banham has been placed in the library. In summary, the commission's recommendations for Cleveland were: that Cleveland should be abolished and four unitary authorities established on the boundaries of the existing district councils - Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Stockton-on-Tees and Langbaurgh-on-Tees (to be renamed Redcar and Cleveland).

It recommended that the county area be returned to the historic counties of Durham (North of the River Tees) and Yorkshire (South of the Tees). Final decision deferred pending decisions on County Durham and North Yorkshire.

It also recommended that combined authorities should be established in the present Cleveland county area for police and fire services, and that the four unitary authorities should maintain separate local plans and a joint structure plan.

The commission reported on Cleveland and Durham together. However, on 29 November 1993 the Secretary of State directed the Commission to carry out a further review of County Durham. The Commission's final report on Durham is due by the end of October - The full text of Mr Gummer's letter to Sir John is given in a separate LGCNet report.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.