Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Hansard 10 July: column 11-122 ...
Hansard 10 July: column 11-122

The government came under pressure to link local transport plans with the planning system and to spell out the need for councils to promote sustainable transport from both Labour and Conservative peers during continuing committee stage of the Transport Bill.

Former Labour transport minister Lord Berkeley intoduced an amendment which would place a duty on local authorities 'to promote sustainable transport, including especially all forms of public passenger transport, and the conveyance of freight by rail or water, and to identify and safeguard such land as may be required for the improvement of transport infrastructure, including interchanges between modes (of transport)'.

He said he was suprised the Bill contained no mention of freight, nor a duty for local plans to incorporate sustainable transport when one of the functions of the Strategic Rail Authority was to help achieve that.

It was important, said Lord Berkeley, for local authorities to have powers to earmark and protect land for transport - as the Greater London Assembly had been given to own and develop land for transport purposes.

Conservative local government spokesman Lord Dixon-Smith said the Bill gave the impression the government's only concern was for buses. He wanted to ensure legislation referred to other forms of transport, including cycling and walking, and the intermodal exchange between different modes of transport.

He also moved an amendemnt designed to involve the planning process to ensure consistency between local and district strategic transport plans.

Liberal Democrat Lord Bradshaw, who described himself as 'a veteran of structure planning in county councils', said: 'I can vouch for the fact that everybody is in favour of extending park-and-ride schemes, of getting more freight on to the railway and of extending station car parks. However, when you try to implement any of those policies, they are always fought tooth and nail at ground level.

'It is important that if we are to have a strategy for encouraging park-and-ride schemes, freight terminals and station car parks, they must find their way into the planning process at the earliest possible moment.'

DETR minister Lord Whitty said guidance to local authorities left a lot to the discretion of local authorities. The more detail on the face of the Bill, the less flexibility there was.

The amendments were withdrawn, but Lord Berkeley urged the minister to reconsider, and warned he might return to the issue on third reading.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.