Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ASSOCIATIONS CONFIRM COMMITMENT NOT TO FREEZE FIRE PAY

  • Comment
Council leaders today met Home Secretary Michael Howard to discuss firefighters' pay and issued a statement confirm...
Council leaders today met Home Secretary Michael Howard to discuss firefighters' pay and issued a statement confirming their commitment not to impose a pay freeze on this group.

Josie Farrington, policy chair, Association of County Councils and Jeremy Beecham, chair of the Association of Metropolitan Authorities, said their concern as employers is to ensure the stability of a well tried system for settling pay in a service which is essential for public safety.

The Home Secretary has confirmed that government policy does not preclude councils from applying the formula next year. The AMA and ACC said their commitment to do so stands.

Mr Howard refused to give any commitment that there would be flexibility in capping limits and fire service standard spending assessments (SSAs) to avoid the cuts in service which might result from their decision.

The leaders said: 'If there is to be a dispute this year all the costs of emergency cover, including standby and preparation would have to be met by fire authorities. They would have great difficulty in doing this.'

The Home Secretary accepted that in the event of a dispute cover would not necessarily be the same as the fire service would normally provide.

The delegation and the Home Secretary agreed the following joint statement: 'The question of the pay formula is a matter for the employers and the Chancellor's statement did not call for or require a pay freeze in the fire service. It is recognised that different arragements for different groups can be concluded.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.