Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Flexibility more important than restructuring funding...
Flexibility more important than restructuring funding

By Nick Golding

Sir Michael Lyons has hinted that he may not call for councils to be less reliant on Whitehall for cash when his Inquiry makes recommendations in December.

Speaking at the Local Government Association annual conference, the man charged by ministers with charting the future of local government appeared to rule out endorsing any radical change in the balance of councils' funding which would mean they raised a bigger proportion of their income locally.

He said: 'My strongest conclusion so far is that the most important issue for local government isn't the balance of funding - it's the need for flexibility in what you do with the money available.'

Sir Michael also warned that those who wanted to see the business rate localised should remember governments were influenced by lobbying from captains of industry, who believe giving councils an ability to increase taxation could restrict profits.

However, more positively for local government, Sir Michael signalled his determination to convince ministers of the case for devolution by linking council empowerment with the government's attempts to give the public greater choice over who provides public services.

'There's been a lot of government rhetoric about choice but that's usually confined to what we as individuals choose. There are choices we need to make collectively, community by community,' he said.

Sir Michael's comments have disappointed those who hoped his final report would give local government more control over its financial destiny.

The Labour group leader on the LGA, Sir Jeremy Beecham, said: 'Where I would differ from Michael is on the balance of funding issue. [Changing the balance] is fairly fundamental - it's a bit of a litmus test on how you can make local government more accountable and more transparent.'

However, Sir Jeremy said he believed the communities and local government secretary, Ruth Kelly, was keener to shift the balance of funding towards councils than Sir Michael.

Tony Travers, director of the Greater London Group at the London School of Economics, warned the turmoil

surrounding the expected hand-over of power from Tony Blair to Gordon Brown could limit ministers' ability to endorse any radical conclusions in Sir Michael's final report.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.