Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Open countryside could be turned into a vast urban sprawl, protesters said at the opening of a public inquiry which...
Open countryside could be turned into a vast urban sprawl, protesters said at the opening of a public inquiry which could affect greenbelt planning decisions in south-east England for years to come, reports The Evening Standard..

At stake is unspoilt land south of Reading, protected for the past 20 years by the M4 'strategic barrier'. Private developers want to build 2,500 homes at Grazeley, a village of fewer than 100 people. Local people say if the development is allowed to go ahead, it will eventually expand into up to 30,000 homes, swallowing acres of green fields and transforming some of the most pleasant country west of London into a polluted, uncontrollable conurbation stretching 15 miles from Reading to Basingstoke.

Thirty-two parish councils have joined the Council for the Protection of Rural England's fight against the proposals, which they say breach the government's commitment to allow house building on greenfield sites only as a last resort. The planning authorities, however, need to find homes for thousands of people drawn to the area by 'Silicon Valley' - the ribbon of hi-tech and computer-related industries along the motorway from west London almost to Bristol.

The Grazeley application is seen as a test case and any breaching of the M4 cordon could have enormous consequences for other proposed developments on rural sites.

The campaigners have come up with a name for the urban development they fear will emerge if the developers win - 'Readingstoke', which they imagine as combining the worst characteristics of Reading and Basingstoke. 'The danger is that Berkshire will turn into something like Middlesex, with no identity, no administrative powers and no countryside,' said one activist.

One of those fears has already come true. Berkshire CC was dismantled this year into six unitary authorities. Campaigners say this has left them without a powerful enough voice in local government to fight their cause, despite the support of most local MPs, including shadow trade and industry secretary John Redwood.

The inquiry, which is expected to last at least a year, is seen as a test of the deputy prime minister John Prescott's declaration that 'it is our firm policy to protect our countryside ... by maximising the use of recycled land'.

Action group chairman Tony Wiseman said: 'When the county council existed, it opposed all developments south of the M4 at Reading because there were no significant towns or even large villages all the way to Basingstoke. The proposed development is simply not viable in terms of schools, infrastructure or profit from the land. It will inevitably grow to as many as 30,000 homes in an area which already has serious traffic problems.'

Tony Burton, of the CPRE, said the creation of 'Readingstoke' would encourage more people to move out of London, but the development would destroy the rural surroundings they sought.

Wokingham DC, the planning authority, is obliged under the 1995 Berkshire Council Structure Plan to find space for the new homes. Two alternative sites have been proposed but they too are in the 'protected' zone south of the motorway.

The council's chief planning officer, Chris Wood, said: 'Although the council would rather see no major development of this size south of the M4, we have been forced by the structure plan to choose the site where we feel this number of houses could be accommodated best with the necessary community facilities and transport infrastructure. It is a case of us trying to make the best of a bad situation.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.