Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Architects savage government's use of building land...
Architects savage government's use of building land

By Jennifer Sprinks

Architects have denounced the government's house-building programme as 'madness' for failing to make better use of available land.

They have rubbished plans to build 200,000 homes in the Thames Gateway and south-east, arguing that such numbers would be unnecessary if government and councils used high-density building.

Speaking at the Westminster Housing Commission's debate on sustainable neighbourhoods, architects and town planners argued that the high-density route is a cheaper means of building developments because it demands infrastructure be brought closer together for health services, education and transport, which attracts more investment.

Architect, urban designer and Westminster Housing Commissioner Sir Terry Farrell, said: 'I do not believe the numbers game because it is about 'place making'.

'There's a kind of madness about how we organise our house-building in this country.

'In the Thames Gateway we could get more people living there than planned because it is practically the same size as central London. So why are there plans for 200,000 homes in the south-east when you can get more homes in London and the Gateway?

'[The borough of] Kensington and Chelsea has the highest density in the world without having high-rise buildings,' said Sir Terry. 'Density is not the cause of housing problems and therefore there's no need to spread [houses] out. It's a town planning issue rather than a housing shortage issue.'

The South East England Regional Assembly's planning manager John Pounder rejected the claims that the 200,000 houses were unnecessary. He agreed however there was a need to move towards higher density, but that it was just as important to ensure new developments take account of local needs and aspirations. 'We can't have a blanket approach to high density as it will vary within different areas,' he said.

A spokesman from the House Builders Federation added: 'Too often the planning system is used to negate the house building programme and we do not think that is right. We want councils to encourage house-building, while allowing us the freedom to cater for housing needs across the market.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.