Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A report commissioned by Birmingham City Council following a tenants' vote against housing stock transfer has come ...
A report commissioned by Birmingham City Council following a tenants' vote against housing stock transfer has come up with a radical solution which would largely replace the council's housing department with a number of small agencies.

The government's plan to transfer 88,000 homes out of council control suffered a serious setback when around 70% voted against the plan (LGC, 12 April).

Unions and anti-privatisation campaigners claimed a massive victory because government ministers saw the project as a landmark for large-scale stock transfer.

At the time, planning minister Lord Falconer remained committed to driving through stock transfer and suggested the council should transfer its housing to an arm's length management organisation.

Unison national officer Colin Meech was furious that transferring control from the council was being considered despite the earlier 'no' vote.

He said: 'We will stand by the tenants as we did during the stock transfer process and we will oppose any form of proposal that seeks to privatise their homes and transfer away their rights.'

The report, called One size doesn't fit all - community housing and flourishing neighbourhoods, recommended new community-based organisations, which would control 80% of the housing management budget and all the repairs budget.

The council plans to establish two pathfinder areas within three months to develop community housing organisations.

The scheme may prove a popular alternative to wholesale stock transfer and is likely to be endorsed by the government.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.