Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
In a letter to the prime minister, shadow environment secretary Gillian Shephard called on him to clarify the condu...
In a letter to the prime minister, shadow environment secretary Gillian Shephard called on him to clarify the conduct of Alan Meale MP. The text of the letter follows:

'I seek clarification regarding the conduct of the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Alan Meale MP.

'Recent newspaper reports suggest that he intervened personally within the Department in a planning matter not directly related to his constituency, on behalf of a businessman with whom Mr Meale is personally acquainted.

'The Minister for the Environment, Rt Hon Michael Meacher MP, maintained on the radio this morning that Mr Meale had not acted improperly and that his actions were not covered by the existing code of conduct for Ministers. There was, according to Mr Meacher an area of greyness which needs to be cleared up. This itself seems to be an admission that Mr Meales actions were wrong, but within the rules, and that the rules therefore need to be tightened.

'But, in fact, the guidelines are clear. Paragraph 46 of the Ministerial Code, published by the Cabinet Office in July of last year, states that however careful [Parliamentary Private Secretaries] may be to make it clear that they are speaking only as Private Members, they are nevertheless liable to be regarded as speaking with some of the authority which is attached to a member of the Government. Generally they must act with a sense of responsibility and with discretion; and they must not associate themselves with particular groups advocating special policies.

'Is this not precisely what Mr Meale has done in this instance? He was, in effect, asking special favours for a friend. At the very least, he has failed to demonstrate that sense of responsibility and discretion to which the guidelines refer. I look to you to clarify the whole matter without delay.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.