Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Home secretary David Blunkett has ordered an urgent shake-up of the controversial asylum dispersal system in what w...
Home secretary David Blunkett has ordered an urgent shake-up of the controversial asylum dispersal system in what will be seen as an admission that it has failed refugees, according to The Observer (p3).

He is particularly worried about the scandal of some private firms contracted to the dispersal scheme exploiting asylum-seekers by providing slum housing. Although Mr Blunkett insists he will not bow to calls to scrap the dispersal process, he has triggered an urgent review of the way it works, led by a senior civil servant.

As part of a wider strategy, asylum-seekers will be urged to do voluntary work in order to reduce hostility from local communities. Mr Blunkett is keen that they be seen to be giving something back to society with more 'purposeful activity', such as helping clean up rundown estates.

The government will face further criticism this week over child refugees when the Refugee Council and Save the Children publish a report highlighting the plight of children separated from their parents.

The review of the dispersal scheme, which has been running only since last April, will please refugee groups - but questions will be raised because it is the second major rethink of policy in a year, following the review of the voucher scheme [which has not been changed].


Just weeks before the murder of a Kurdish asylum-seeker at Sighthill, Glasgow City Council was warned by a delegation of community workers and architects that serious outbreaks of racial violence were inevitable, reported The Independent on Sunday (p8).

Despite being urged to introduce cheap, quick-fix measures to lessen the likelihood of attacks, the council ignored the advice, citing lack of funds. Through the home office's dispersal scheme, the council is receiving£105m over five years for housing asylum-seekers.

'We urged them to spend money on building a community centre, the one thing that the asylum-sekers wanted above all else', said architect Michael MacAuley.

A council spokesman said 'the idea that you can defuse racial tension by building a community centre is simplistic'. Such a move, he said, would only have heightened tensions between ethnic minorities and the indigenous population, who already say that asylum-seekers get preferential treatment.

But community leaders are convinced a community centre could have relieved tensions.

The delegation, in June, was delivering to the council the results of a 12-month study by Strathclyde University architecture department into living conditions at Sighthill. Ethnic minorities make up about 68% of the population on the estate.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.