Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

From ‘LGA’ to ‘LG Group’... and back again?


The Local Government Association is preparing the way to reverse its decision to change its name in the wake of a wide-ranging group shake-up, LGC understands.

The LGA underwent a rebranding exercise last year to implement a common naming policy across the group of bodies that make up the wider LGA ‘family’.

This saw the LGA rechristened the Local Government Group – or LG Group – and the organisations formerly known as the Improvement & Development Agency and the Leadership Centre for Local Government renamed Local Government Improvement and Local Government Leadership respectively.

The situation was complicated by the Local Government Association label being retained for certain committees and decision-making bodies and also for media and campaigning purposes. For example, the association’s main strategic body is called the LG Group Executive while the committee that advises it is known as the LGA Leadership Board.

LGC now understands that the ground is being prepared for the group to revert to the LGA label more generally.

Members have discussed the confusion that the original changes brought about and, while no formal decision has been made yet, the new chairman Sir Merrick Cockell (Con) is understood to be in favour of the reversion.

Sir Merrick spoke at an LGA event in the east Midlands yesterday. One senior council officer present at the event tweeted: “The LGG appears to have gone back to being the LGA again. Just as I was getting used to the change!”

A spokesman for what is still technically the LG Group said: “At the moment we are the Local Government Group but we have still carried on using the LGA brand. Members have discussed this but no formal decision has been made.”

To avoid confusion, LGC has retained a style policy of referring to the LGA in all instances other than those when the wider family of organisations is being discussed.

The LG Group’s executive meeting on 13 October represents the next opportunity for the issue to be discussed by members.


Readers' comments (3)

  • some of us never moved away from the LGA

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Roger

    I hope somebody will be sending a bill, for all the wasted paperwork, to those bright sparks who initiated the orignal trendy re-branding exercise. Just another bad habit picked up from central government. I can feel an FOI coming on to make public the cost first and now second(?) change.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The words "piss-up" and "brewery" spring to mind

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.