Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A Bristol schoolboy, expelled after being accused of trying to kick a fellow pupil in the face and threatening him ...
A Bristol schoolboy, expelled after being accused of trying to kick a fellow pupil in the face and threatening him with a knife, will be back in the classroom next term after a top judge's ruling.

The school's governors went to the high court after Bristol City Council's exclusion appeal panel ordered the 14-year-old boy's reinstatement, but had their case dismissed by Mr Justice Hooper.

Rejecting the governors' judicial review challenge after a two-hour hearing, the judge said: 'The appeal panel reached a conclusion it was reasonably entitled to reach.'

The governors and the school's headteacher decided the boy should be permanently excluded after a playground brawl in March in which another pupil was said to have 'wielded a chain.'

After an investigation the headteacher found that the boy had kicked another schoolboy in the face and brought a dangerous weapon to school - a knife - which he used to threaten a fellow pupil.

But the exclusion appeal panel disagreed and ordered the school to take the boy back in May.

The panel said that, although the boy had taken a knife to school, the other allegations against him had not been proved, and his behaviour had not been so serious as to justify expulsion.

Upholding the Panel's decision, Mr Justice Hooper said he had 'no doubt' that the boy's behaviour had been fully investigated and the decision to reinstate him could not be described as irrational.

The judge told the court: 'It is the governors' case that the Appeal Panel must have completely ignored the fact that the boy pulled out a knife during the fight.'

Miss Karen Steyn, for the Governors, also argued that, on his own admission, the boy had aimed kicks at another pupil's head which would have caused serious injury had they connected.

But Dr David Woolf, representing the appeal panel, said there was no evidence that the blade of the knife had been opened, nor that it had been used to threaten the other pupil.

Strand News Service

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.