Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A randomly selected group of councils should have spending restrictions lifted as a first step to end capping, acco...
A randomly selected group of councils should have spending restrictions lifted as a first step to end capping, according to Institute for Fiscal Studies deputy director Dr Stephen Smith.

Speaking at a joint local authority association seminar on capping in London on Tuesday, Dr Smith said releasing the shackles on a limited number of councils would provide the government with vital information on the likely impact of freeing all authorities from restrictions.

'This information would be important in giving the government confidence to relax the regime generally,' Dr Smith said.

'The idea is to relax constraints for a relatively small number of councils, see what happens and go further if the forecast disaster does not occur,' he said.

He suggested that a 'sin bin' may have to be introduced for councils which abuse the relaxation of rules.

Dr Smith said the 'advanced party option' was preferable to a sudden abolition of capping or allowing certain authorities awarded a 'trust' status greater financial freedom.

According to Dr Smith, the consequence of a 'bonfire of controls' would be an 'enormous expansion of local authority spending'.

'The problem with big bang is it encourages local authorities to do things which is collectively not in their interests,' he said.

Dr Smith said treasurers would take a short term view and assume the relaxation in rules would not last and would raise spending as much as possible to gain the maximum advantage for their councils.

A policy of allowing greater financial freedom for councils that meet certain criteria would also be unacceptable, Dr Smith said, because it would effectively increase central government control.

He said councils would be faced with conforming to government-selected criteria if they wanted capping removed.

This approach would also fail to give an accurate picture of what would happen if capping was completely abolished since freedom to spend would be given to councils who were least likely to abuse the restored power.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.