Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The Times today (p15) carries four letters on the local government review. ...
The Times today (p15) carries four letters on the local government review.

Canterbury city council chief executive Christopher Gay writes to say that an essay published in the Times last week by Sir John Boynton was very much the point of view of a distinguished practitioner who 'made it' under a system 'now overtaken by events'.

Those of his former colleagues who have been struggling to make the best of the present two tier structure remain unconvinced, he writes, adding that for the last 20 years 'we have seen duplication of effort, buck passing, unproductive aggravation and a lack of accountability. We now desperately need a fundamental improvement in the quality and purpose of local government. This opportunity must not be missed.'

In another letter Trevor Marwood, chairman of Hertfordshire CC from May 1991-1993, says that Sir John Boynton accurately reflects many of the current anxieties in county government about planned changes.

He writes: 'Here in Hertfordshire many people share Sir John's criticism about the government's faith in unitary authorities. His county has attempted to reintroduce local dialogue, writes Mr Marwood and says that a review of local government based on the premise that local authorities can act in isolation is doomed to failure.
  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.