Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CHIEF EXECS MAY LOSE INTEREST IN NEXT CPA

  • Comment
Councils are on the verge of giving up on the comprehensive performance assessment because the next round makes it ...
Councils are on the verge of giving up on the comprehensive performance assessment because the next round makes it impossible to move up the categories, chief executives have warned.

The Audit Commission's proposed approach requires 'significant improvement' - more than simply making up the missing points - if councils are to move up a category.

Redcar & Cleveland BC chief executive Colin Moore said: 'It was a matter of chance where we fell last time round. Those of us who were only just outside a category have got to go for better than those who are already in the higher category.

'If you're just below it's impossible to achieve progress. Councils will just give up.'

Haringey LBC chief executive David Warwick warned: '[Some] authorities are taking the view, do we have to play this game at all, is it relevant?'

Concerns intensified after a change

was made to the commission's published proposals.

Councils whose service scores improve, but have a poor corporate assessment will need a further corporate assessment before they can move up a category. The initial version of the consultation document CPA: the next steps said fair councils would need a 2003-04 service score at the upper end of three or a 2002 corporate assessment score at the upper end of two to be eligible for a corporate assessment.

However, the commission has now told chief executives their councils must achieve the stated scores in both services and their 2002 corporate assessment.

Mr Moore added: 'We're going to have to really fight this. They've made it even worse [and] it's a ludicrous position. It contradicts the basic rules of public services which means the commission could be up for a judicial review.

'The one point between 'good' and 'fair' costs us £100,0000 in audit and inspection fees. We think that would be better spent on improving services, rather than lining the pockets of the commission.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.