Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CHIEF OFFICERS OPPOSE TRIBUNAL COST-CUTTING

  • Comment
The government has proposed changes to the industrial tribunal system which will erode local government employment ...
The government has proposed changes to the industrial tribunal system which will erode local government employment rights, chief officers' union MPO claimed this week.

The government has consulted on legislation which would mean more individual disputes in areas such as unfair dismissal could be settled outside tribunals, by binding arbitration.

The proposals are intended to reduce the cost of processing industrial tribunal cases.

The number of cases completed each year has almost doubled in the past decade. In 1993-94 the government spent almost £24 million on hearing them.

Arbitrators would oversee reinstatement and reingagement and award compensation. If both sides agreed to binding arbitration, the case could not then go to industrial tribunal.

'Anything that reduces peoples' opportunity to resort to industrial tribunal erodes their employment rights,' said MPO general secretary Graham Corless.

'For my members, industrial tribunals are a last resort. When independent arbitrators adjudicate on cases we often still end up at industrial tribunal.'

The government would allow the conciliation service ACAS to arbitrate in unfair dismissal disputes. Alternatively, both sides could elect an arbitrator to settle all disputes brought by or against individuals which are now heard by tribunals.

Employer secretaries on the 10 provincial councils in England and Wales welcomed the changes. They see the government's proposals as an opportunity to extend their role in settling disputes, if their member authorities agree. Their view is supported by the Local Government Management Board and the Society of Chief Personnel Officers.

Both union and employer representatives sit on provincial councils, which deal only with local government.

They are currently used to settle small disputes over grading and salaries, but also help negotiate leaving settlements for chief executives and chief officers.

Ron Simpson, East Midlands provincial council employers' secretary, said arbitration would work well on an informal basis, with small meetings rather than hearings in front of large union/employer panels.

'Increasingly, we talk to colleagues on an informal, confidential basis. A good provincial council is like an iceberg, a lot of good work goes on unseen, on the phone and in visits,' said Mr Simpson.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.