Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Governors and parents at church schools are being divided by new government guidelines which state that children in...
Governors and parents at church schools are being divided by new government guidelines which state that children in care should be at the top of admission lists, reported The Sunday Times (p7).

The policy has sparked anger in some quarters that standards at some of the country's best state schools may be lowered. Others say that children in care should always have been given priority by church schools on grounds of Christian fairness.

The guidelines, which come into force next year, call for all state-funded schools to give priority to children from care homes, who it describes as 'a disadvantaged group who have very low levels of attainment.'

Church schools will retain discretion over their admissions, but are coming under pressure from the church itself to abide by the guidelines. The Church of England provides a quarter of the primary schools in England. Many have excelled in league tables and are oversubscribed.

Local education authorities, among others, have now come into conflict with rebel schools that are refusing to place children in care as a priority. In some schools governors plan to continue putting candidates from care homes at the bottom of the list, below even non-Christians.

'The blunt truth is church schools are operating a selective policy creaming off the middle class,' said one governor of a London primary school that is refusing to implement the guidelines.

The government says 59% of the 60,000 children in care in England left school without a GCSE last year. It aims to cut this figure to 10% by 2006.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.