Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The government will today order curbs on public sector workers retiring early because of ill health, reports The Ti...
The government will today order curbs on public sector workers retiring early because of ill health, reports The Times (p1).

Ministers want to stamp out abuse of the system and cut a bill that is costing taxpayers£1bn a year.

A report to be published by Andrew Smith, chief secretary to the Treasury, will show that there are a third more retirements in the public sector than in private business.

It will also highlight wide variations in early retirement rates across the public sector and within different parts of the service. It will also suggest that rules are being enforced in a lax way.

A Whitehall source said last night: 'Where there is abuse it must be rooted out. The waste of taxpayers' money is scandalous.'

Today's report will propose:

that ill-health retirement should be granted only if an employee is 'incapable' of working until normal pensionable age;

that the medical assessment carried out before a person can retire early should be applied with much more 'consistency and rigour';

assessments should ideally be carried out at 'arm's length' by doctors from outside the service;

workers unfit for operational duties should be redeployed to less stressful work.

A government source said: 'No one is saying that ill-health retirement should not be available for genuine cases. This government is on the side of the taxpayer and those who depend on the public services and it determined to look after their interests as well.

'At the moment it costs£1bn a year. We are determined to cut the bill and get the money where it is needed most - in frontline services. If the retirement rate is one in 10 in one authority and nine out of 10 in another, there must be huge scope for improvement.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.