Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The provision of local government services through the internet took a modest step forward this week with the publi...
The provision of local government services through the internet took a modest step forward this week with the publication of the draft national strategy on local e-government.

Less marginalised than it once was, technology is still something that, if they are honest, fails to ignite many in local government and the strategy is unlikely to change that.

Progress toward the 2005 target is slow, and there are forces within the DTLR who would prefer simply to tell councils what to do instead of faffing around with consultation.

Such an approach would be a case of the blind leading the blind. A National Audit Office report has found central government is struggling to make a success of

e-government. Half its services are online, but most are information only and none collect revenue. Civil servants just do not understand how to use IT, the report adds.

But even if central government had solved every problem, a prescriptive approach towards local government would not work.

Technology is part of government, not just an efficiency test councils pass or fail. It has to be tied into the local political vision or it will not produce results.

As a speaker at last year's Society of Local Authority Chief Executives & Senior Managers conference observed, getting in all the latest technology without knowing why is like 'putting lipstick on a pig - the pig doesn't necessarily look any better'.

There is no point in having a hi-tech information kiosk if you have no communications vision.

This is precisely what the draft strategy has failed to address, say critics. It may have avoided prescription but it has not tackled the vision element. It will not enthuse IT-phobic councillors to invest time in e-government and is destined to gather dust on shelves.

Perhaps the government is saving this discussion for its paper on e-democracy. But e-democracy and e-services are one and the same. The changes IT can make to services, by improving consultation, accessibility and quality, will add to the democratic process.

There ought to be a buzz around e-government. At a time when councils are being performance-managed into the ground,

e-government is as important locally as it is nationally. It has been argued that the comprehensive performance assessment takes the ballot box out of the equation. Can IT can put it back in?

The strategy must excite interest. Not being talked about will be its biggest failing.

Go to the discussion forumto tell us what you think

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.