Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Challenging times await the Local Government Association's education department. ...
Challenging times await the Local Government Association's education department.

No sooner has the association responded to public criticism by its own staff about its restructure (LGC, 18 January), than a quarrel threatens to overshadow its plan for a new strategic way of working in its education division.

Genuine concern from education directors about the loss of specialist posts and the new project-based system means the already strained relationship between them and the association may disintegrate completely.

Rumblings from members of the association's education executive may compound the problem if fervent assurances are not given by the head of the education and social policy division, John Ransford.

But in effect, Mr Ransford's hands are tied. Chief executive Brian Briscoe and his management team have staked their credibility on the success of the association's new structure. They cannot make concessions to education directors and members before the new structure has had a chance to bed in, or they will be criticised for not believing in their own modernisation programme.

No one would intelligently argue the association's education department is not due for an overhaul. It is widely accepted a more dynamic department is desperately needed if it is to influence policy.

With Mr Ransford at the helm, the new division, which aims to be more flexible and faster on its feet, appeals to many, especially as Mr Ransford has a successful record with the association's former department of social affairs, health and housing.

The association has to balance the need for an efficient organisation with the requirement to meet the needs of all its members.

If the concerns of education directors are not considered the association is in danger of being usurped as the voice of local government education services.

A major threat comes from the Confederation of Education Officers which, once formed, will develop its own links with the Department for Education & Skills.

But the education establishment must take a significant share of the blame for local government's failure to take the lead on education policy. Whatever the problems, the association's new education and social policy division has the potential to be powerful and influential. And it is bound to be an improvement on the old, failed regime.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.