Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The option of mayor and council manager has had a ringing endorsement from Shepway DC residents. ...
The option of mayor and council manager has had a ringing endorsement from Shepway DC residents.

Except it has not. A remarkably low response rate from residents suggests the vast majority do not care one way or the other.

A special edition of the council's newspaper, Shepway Today, was sent to 33,000 homes. Only 85 responses came back.

Only 47 of the council's partners and stakeholders - which includes staff - responded. Just two of these were received via the internet. The biggest sample was

a phone survey of 500 residents.

Of these, 41% favoured a mayor/manager model.

The mayor/cabinet model got support from 32% and leader/cabinet 20%. But clearly the overall response, for a council with a population of over 100,000, was very poor.

Moreover, residents made a series of responses in direct contradiction to their preference for a directly elected mayor.

For example, they wanted the council to be run by a group of people rather than just one or two.

It emerged from the consultation that the council does not communicate or consult well: 'It needs to be imaginative about communicating . . . there was not a feeling that the council is listening to local people or taking account of local views.'

The council is now in a tricky position. The low response rate could be to do with a lack of publicity on the council's part, as much as lack of interest. Is it going to show it has listened, and accept the result of the survey?

If it goes for this choice, it could do worse. Other consultations around the country show the popularity of directly elected mayors with the public is widespread - if Shepway had got more responses, it might have had the same result.

It might be a odd for Shepway to end up with a mayor and council manager, a model usually associated with big cities. But smaller councils need outward-looking, innovative leadership just as much as the bigger ones - a style of leadership this model provides.

The consultation also revealed a dislike of 'party politicking', an aspect of council life a mayor and manager could leave to one side.

The council is not sure what to make of the result, and is right to think through its response carefully. But it has an exciting opportunity to test a political model which could deliver great benefits.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.