Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Some major companies have an informal 'blacklist' of local authorities where they will not tender for business beca...
Some major companies have an informal 'blacklist' of local authorities where they will not tender for business because of their bias against private sector bidders, Lord Nolan's inquiry into Aspects of Conduct in Local Government was told today.

The Business Services Association, which represents major employers with between them more than 300,000 staff and a turnover in excess of £4bn, said in evidence to Lord Nolan that some other companies had reached the point where they would not bid for local government work at all.

Others scrutinised a local authority's record closely when it issued an invitation to tender before deciding whether or not to submit a bid.

The association's director-general, Norman Rose, said some estimates suggested that member companies would no longer choose to deal with up to 50% of local authorities in England and Wales.

Compulsory competitive tendering of cleaning, catering, refuse collection and maintenance services has now been in operation for more than 10 years, with most contracts seeing two or three rounds of bidding.

'So if a service has not gone to the private sector in those rounds, it is unlikely to go to one next time,' said Mr Rose. 'One London authority recently found themselves unable to attract ANY outside bidders for a service in this position.'

Commenting as he submitted his evidence, Mr Rose said: 'It is time rather more consideration was given to the needs of the council taxpayer and a little less to protecting inefficient local authorities.

'At best, some of their practices are misguided and misplaced leading to overpricing, overmanning and poorer services. At worst they are dishonest, withholding information from bidders and sharing a determination that work will not go outside come what may.

'At the same time there is no doubt that a significant number of local authorities have learnt the value of contracting out non core services to private companies with the quality of service and value for money it brings.'

The BSA has made a number of recommendations to improve propriety, even handiness, quality and value for money coupled with a partnership approach to enable both sides to get most from their contractual relationship.

In particular it calls for:

-- Audit Commission powers to establish performance indicators for different local authority functions

-- Value for money should be defined in a way which allows quality and best value indicators to be included alongside price

-- As much emphasis should be placed on improvement to services as on price

-- The District Authority should oblige local authorities which did not meet those standards to put the particular service out to tender, with internal bidders disbarred because they clearly could not meet required performance standards

-- A partnership approach should be encouraged between the service provider and the local authority

-- Compulsory competitive tendering should be replaced by a voluntary system based on value for money

-- Tendering procedures should be transparent with the same information available to all bidders

'Together these initiatives would offer the council tax payer some real improvements in the quality of some of their services, with the knowledge that contracts were being fairly let and they were getting best value.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.