Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A number of London-based bodies are making last-ditch attempts to ensure mayor Ken Livingstone's all-important Lond...
A number of London-based bodies are making last-ditch attempts to ensure mayor Ken Livingstone's all-important London Plan - a blueprint for the capital's future - is focused and borough-friendly.

The first draft of the mayor's London Plan, or spatial development strategy, will be published in a couple of weeks.

There are fears the draft, which sets out an all-encompassing vision for the next 15 years, will ride roughshod over London boroughs and be too bureaucratic.

A spokesman for the Association of London Government said the plan would need to be 'coherent' and provide a 'framework for detailed action by the boroughs'.

The Labour group on the London Assembly is eager to see a good relationship with boroughs - as well as with business - receive its due in the document.

Labour planning spokesman John Biggs said the plan must be 'lean and strategic'.

He said: 'There was something called a greater London development plan, under the Greater London Council, which was widely viewed as so bureaucratic that it never saw the light of day.'

It was too early to say if this plan would avoid that trap: 'One gets different messages out of the Greater London Authority woodwork.'

Another burning issue is how the London mayor will ensure developers build a percentage of affordable housing.

The problem is particularly complex in inner London, where boroughs can make huge profits from luxury developments.

Bob Neill (Con), chair of the planning and spatial development committee, said: 'This will be a test of Ken Livingstone's credibility to see how flexible he is according to what [the assembly] has said.'

The assembly is far from united. The Conservative group is concerned developers will be put off building houses because of demands for affordable housing. They have also attacked what they see as an anti-car bias in the plan.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.