Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ContactPoint: 'an idiotic choice'

  • 1 Comment

ContactPoint is a classic Government behemoth - according to the Conservatives’ shadow children’s minster Tim Loughton in this article commissioned by LGC. He is responding to an item backing the project by DCSF minister Delyth Morgan.

A database which has so far cost £224m to implement and will cost £41m a year to run, it is designed to contain all the professional contact details of every one of England’s 11 million children.

Conceived in the aftermath of the Victoria Climbié tragedy in 2003, ContactPoint was part of the Government’s solution to child protection.

The other part? The abolition of the tried and tested child protection register. Thus was borne a typically bloated New Labour creation: expensive, unnecessary, but worst of all, unsafe.

Because this Government has displayed the most extraordinary incompetence in its handling of IT projects, it is extremely unlikely that this body of data will be either accurate or secure.

The public are starting to wake up to the idiocy of this brave new reality

Tim Loughton

The DCSF has, in effect, already admitted this by making provision for some children - the children of celebrities and MPs - to have their data ‘shielded’.

This is the loophole that proves the lie: if the Government had any faith in the security of ContactPoint they would not have needed to invent shielding, as it is we will have a two-tier database with one set of rules for a privileged few and another for everyone else.

We think it is what people do with that information that counts.

We are committed to cutting back on the paperwork and desk time that stifles professional action and deprives vulnerable children of time with social workers.

We will free the workforce from box-ticking and form filling so that it can concentrate on talking to genuinely needy children - children who have been abused; children in care; children from households suffering domestic violence - their families and other professionals.

This is why, since its inception, we have consistently opposed ContactPoint and why at conference Michael Gove committed us to scrapping it.

This project puts the details of 11 million children into a database assembled and run by a Government singularly incapable of keeping our data safe.

As ContactPoint begins to impose itself upon the lives of English families, the public are starting to wake up to the idiocy of this brave new reality.

It is time the Government did likewise.

Tim Loughton is the Conservatives’ shadow children’s minister

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Do the Tories have any suggestions as to how parishioners/professionals can share information and contact each other in a timely fashion? There is absolutely no 100% safe means of storing data; paperwork gets lost and data can become corrupt. However, I don't agree with the DCSF's decision to shield the details of children of celebrities and MPs. Wealthy parents who are not famous could put forward the argument that their children would be vulnerable. I could argue that I don't want my daughter's (2 years old) details disclosed because she is exceptionally beautiful and if anyone saw her that would want to take her! (Over the top I know but I'm sure you get my point). Furthermore it does give the impression that security of ContactPoint is flawed. ContactPoint uses the same security software as online banks, which are about as secure as you can get. Perhaps the Tories would like to remember why ContactPoint was developed in the first case, Victoria Climbie. There are far too many children being abused and moved around the country at an alarming rate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.