Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The Independent Commission on Local Government and the Scottish ...
The Independent Commission on Local Government and the Scottish

Parliament's consultation paper published today points Scottish local

government in the right direction, reflecting the modernising agenda

set out by COSLA in its submission to the commission.

Warmly welcoming the paper, COSLA president Keith Geddes highlighted

the idea of a covenant between the parliament and local government:

'Such covenant, setting out the principles of the relationship between ourselves, the parliament and its executive, is welcome, as is the idea of a joint forum where MSPs and local government representatives can meet on a basis of equality.'

Cllr Geddes also welcomed the commission's support for electoral

reform - provided that the essential link between councillor and

constituent is maintained - and for new forms of leadership for

councils, such as the cabinet system.

'Communities need and deserve clear vision and strong local

leadership,' he continued, 'that will be an important counter balance

in the new relationship between local government and the parliament.

'But we also need to recognise that there are still part of Scotland

where local government is not operated on a party political basis and

what might be the right for the West Isles will not work in Glasgow -

a blanket solution would be wrong and I am glad the commission has

recognised that.'

COSLA's only objection is to the proposal that employees could be

councillors in the council which employs them.

'I understand the arguments - but I don't agree with the conclusions,'

Mr Geddes commented, 'there is a fundamental issue of conflict of interest which cannot be easily overcome.

'It is not sufficient, for example, to stop officers above a certain

salary level standing for election to their council, or to prevent a

teacher who is a councillor from being chair of an education

committee. Such proposals will not cover the situation where a

council could easily contain a majority of council employees.

'This is clearly undesirable - employment with a council is offered on

the clear understanding of the conditions that come with it and I

believe that is where the matter should rest.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.