Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
There are fundamental flaws in the current system of funding local government, a report by the Audit Commission con...
There are fundamental flaws in the current system of funding local government, a report by the Audit Commission concludes. The grant from central government amounts to 75% of local authorities' spending, but there is no breakdown of how it is calculated.

Audit Commission chairman James Strachan said: 'This year's record rises have caused intense controversy which have generated more heat than light. Our study explores the funding in detail and we hope it will significantly inform the debate.

'The complexity of the system and its lack of transparency hinder the taxpayer's ability to understand it. And the funding structure, with only 25% raised locally, heightens the difficulties. Councils may have ambitious plans to enhance public services, but local taxpayers have to ask if they want to pay for these. That has to be a local choice, and can only be made well if people are properly informed.'

The report recommends that a review of local government funding already underway should seek to reduce the proportion of funding coming from central government. It also urges greater transparency of how government calculates its annual grant.

If there are differences of opinion between the central and local authorities about the size of overall local budget, the effect of council tax increases can be very significant. Because less than 25% of a council's funding comes from council tax, it alone has to make up the difference.

Council spending was 9% above last year's, an increase of one per cent greater than the additional central government grant. Because of the 'gearing effect', caused by local government deriving most of its funding from central government, that contributed to average council tax increases of 12.9%.

The commission's report found that local authorities faced significant additional cost pressures this year, including increased expectations from the public, government and regulators. The government increased its grant to take account of specific factors s uch as the rise in employer national insurance contributions. But the Audit Commission was not able to assess whether the extra funding fully compensated councils because the government does not disclose how it reaches those decisions.

This year also saw significant changes to the grant distribution formula, with authorities in the Midlands and the north broadly benefiting while London and the south-east were disadvantaged. There was a clear association between the size of grant increase a council received and its increase in council tax - the greater the increase in grant the less was the increase in the council tax.

According to the report, the additional local government spending this year should improve services and much has been directed towards meeting government targets, for example those on recycling. The impact of education was significant as well. The combined effect of the passporting requirement, designed to ensure that all councils increased spending in line with government requirements, and local choice to spend above the passported amount, led to spending in aggregate increasing by £200m more than the government had allowed for.

Most councils did identify some savings. However many did not look hard enough for measures to reduce the burden on the council taxpayer. 'Peer pressure' on councils to moderate spending and council tax rises was weak, partly because of the unusual circumstances created by the grant redistribution.

Thirteen of the 20 highest increases were police authorities. They are an example of a precept authority: one which sets a budget and then passes its funding requirement on to the relevant local authority for inclusion in the council's overall council tax. In a single service authority such as police authority it can be more difficult to address pressures by offsetting against savings elsewhere. But the report also notes that police authorities are not directly elected and do not have responsibility for collecting the tax. That, the report says, means they are less directly affected by pressure from council tax payers.


Council tax rose by an average of 12.9% in England this year - a record since the tax's introduction a decade ago and well ahead of the 7.2% average rise in 2002/03.

A summary of the report is available hereand the full national report is available here.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.