Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Some councils are not making the most of the planning system to secure benefits for communities from new developmen...
Some councils are not making the most of the planning system to secure benefits for communities from new development, according to an independent report published by the Audit Commission today.

Contributions from developers can be secured to support the increased demands on services created by new developments. These Section 106 agreements can provide facilities such as affordable housing, schools, leisure amenities, town centre improvements and new roads or transport schemes.

But the commission's report, Securing Community Benefits through the Planning Process, finds that there is a wide variation in what councils gain through Section 106 agreements and that, as a result, some communities could be missing out. The commission estimates that developer contributions may vary from around£500 to up to£30,000 per dwelling, depending on factors such as local property values and infrastructure needs.

The report recognises that there are often valid reasons for the disparity and acknowledges some limitations inherent in the process. But overall it concludes that, in order to operate the system most effectively, councils need detailed policies setting out what they expect to achieve through Section 106 agreements, as well as processes to ensure that applications are dealt with consistently. In addition, councils could improve their understanding of the financial impact of their policy requirements on new development - such as affordable housing or school places - in order to judge whether they are reasonable and achievable.

Steve Bundred, chief executive of the Audit Commission, said: 'Councils with weaknesses in their approach to Section 106 agreements are less likely to secure community benefits. This report aims to help councils implement effective changes, encourage them to adopt a strategic approach and to test the financial impacts of their policies on developments.

'Developing a comprehensive set of policies and supporting procedures will require time, commitment and resources, but our report and the range of guidance we have produced will help councils move forward and eventually secure the rewards.'

As a result of its findings, the Audit Commission has produced guides and checklists to help local authorities improve ( It has recommended that councils develop Section 106 policies and procedures and that they make sure council leaders understand how potential developer contributions can help create sustainable communities.

The Audit Commission makes its recommendations against a backdrop of changing national policy. Future economic conditions and a range of proposed policy developments, including the proposed Planning Gain Supplement, have potential implications for councils' approach to Section 106 agreements. But the commission's view is that councils should act now to strengthen their policies and procedures because that should stand them in good stead for current, and future, systems. This is particularly important for councils starting from a relatively low base.


As part of the planning process, a local planning authority and a developer may enter into a legal agreement to provide infrastructure and services on or off the development site that can not be secured through planning conditions. This is called a Section 106 agreement.


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.