Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

COUNCILS GO TO COURT IN STANSTED BATTLE

  • Comment
A coalition of five local councils have lodged a legal challenge to the government's Aviation White Paper proposals...
A coalition of five local councils have lodged a legal challenge to the government's Aviation White Paper proposals to more than quadruple the capacity of Stansted Airport.

The county councils of Essex and Hertfordshire, together with the district councils of Uttlesford, North Hertfordshire and East Hertfordshire, have lodged leave to seek a judicial review.

The councils are particularly concerned that the plans put forward by BAA represent a 'land grab' that will leave the company with the ability to expand the airport up to 120 million passengers per annum.

The principle points of the challenge are:

- The wide spaced runway at Stansted, and the alignment of the extension at London Luton airport set out in the White Paper and shown on plans in it are too specific: the White Paper as drafted effectively circumvents the statutory planning processes and the Environmental Impact assessment required by European legislation.

- Funding and viability: at present neither the Government nor BAA know how the airport development and associated infrastructure is to be funded. This is fundamental to the viability of the airport development and cannot be seen as a later exercise. The development will cause unnecessary blight if it is subsequently proven not to be viable.

- At Luton the runway proposal in the White Paper is not one in the consultation paper and has therefore emerged without any public consultation.

In the first step of the legal challenge process, the councils wrote to the secretary of state for transport raising concerns over the legality of some aspects of the paper. In their response, the Department for Transport rejects the councils' concerns, leaving no option but to progress a legal challenge.

Lord Hanningfield, leader of Essex CCsaid: 'Airports in the UK have a history of creeping expansion. We are being asked to accept a fourfold increase in the capacity of Stansted. This is not acceptable and it stretches credulity that we be expected to accept a location of a second runway that would give the airport the footprint and hence the potential capacity to be the world's largest airport.'

Robert Ellis, leader of Hertfordshire CC added: 'We believe the white paper is fundamentally flawed. There is still no robust case for new runways in the South East. The environmental implications of airport development have consistently been underestimated, yet the Government is rushing into decisions which will irrevocably change the face of this part of England.

'The White Paper's support for the new runway pre-empts the established planning process which would deal intelligently with expansion proposals through a fully accountable process. At Luton, the extension of the runway has not been consulted on at all.

'Our legal challenge will explore just how much local accountability remains in the UK planning system. '

Essex CC successfully mounted a legal challenge last year over the exclusion of Gatwick Airport from earlier deliberations on airport expansion in the southeast.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.