Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A survey by the Local Government Association has shown that some councils are unhappy with the bureaucratic difficu...
A survey by the Local Government Association has shown that some councils are unhappy with the bureaucratic difficulties of the new welfare to work programme, reports The Financial Times (p6).

The LGA surveyed the 11 pathfinder areas where the scheme was tested from January and found that councils were unhappy with the new deal's contractual arrangements.

The report says: 'Many of the authorities surveyed felt that the process and documentation were too bureaucratic and too rigid, with processes of clarification taking too long.'

The majority of councils in the pilot areas were confident the employment service fully understood the contribution the authority could make to the programme.

The reports says: 'Where relationships between the employment service and the local authority were good, the advent of the new deal has resulted in even closer working.

'On the other hand, where relations were poor or non-existent, in many cases putting the new deal in place to a tight timetable has often been at the expense of securing effective local partnerships.'

Some 58% of councils surveyed were involved in offering work on the programme's environment taskforce, 39% involved with the voluntary sector option, but only a small number participated in the employment option.

The reports also says that councils have continued to contract and this year's financial settlement will lead to further cuts and moratoriums on recruitment.

'Recruiting new deal employees (and, more importantly, retaining them after six months) in those circumstances would run contrary to the new deal conditions,' it says.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.