Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CPA SCRAPS CLASSIFICATION TERMS

  • Comment
By Jon Hanlon ...
By Jon Hanlon

The Audit Commission has agreed to scrap the terms used to classify councils in the comprehensive performance assessment, but is refusing to consider levels of funding and deprivation when passing judgment.

Councils expressed dissatisfaction at the proposed terms 'high-performing, striving, coasting and failing'. These will now be replaced by either 'excellent, good, fair, weak and poor' or 'excellent, good, fair and poor'.

Quality will be measured on both current performance and proven capacity to improve.

The commission's director of inspection Paul Kirby outlined plans for the weighting of each service, which will form the basis for CPA ranking.

Single-tier councils rated under the CPA can only be excellent if they are fair or better in education, social services and finance. Levels of funding and deprivation will not form part of the assessment, he said.

Mr Kirby said: 'There is no relation between deprivation and performance. There are high performing councils in poor areas. The funding formula is weighted to deprivation. Areas with higher levels of deprivation get extra money. There are councils with a hell of a lot of deprivation achieving more with less money.'

The commission immediately faced criticism for the proposal to use the categories 'weak' and 'poor', which Local Government Information Unit director Dennis Reed said would be just as confusing as the previous suggestion to use the words 'coasting' and 'striving'.

He added: 'Using crude categories is

not helpful. No council can be branded in that way. The whole thing needs to be

re-negotiated.'

Mr Reed expressed concern that corporate assessments are being carried out while consultation on the process is still ongoing. But Mr Kirby claimed responses to consultation on CPA showed councils are 'broadly happy' with the progress of CPA so far.

The commission will publish a consultation paper on how the services are weighted next week. For further details see LGCnet .

The CPA story so far

At a feedback session on the CPA pilots the government heard inspectors must be competent to inspire confidence in the process.

Councils stressed the judgments must not become an end in themselves. They must be linked to improvement, and freedoms must follow swiftly.

But it was too early for councils to say if they had confidence in final CPA ratings as the pilots have not yet progressed that far.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.