Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A multi-faith foundation that had hoped to build 'the most significant multi-cultural project in Britain for the Mi...
A multi-faith foundation that had hoped to build 'the most significant multi-cultural project in Britain for the Millennium' in Harrow, using£10m of lottery money, have failed in a high court challenge to The Millennium Commission's refusal to grant funding.

Backing the Commission's decision on Friday, Mr justice Lightman found that it had to weigh up the merits of the proposed Asha Centre against those of other applicants, and said: 'Unfortunately in any competition, as well as winners there are losers.'

The Asha Foundation had launched the high court challenge to the Millennium Commission's decision to reject its application for funding under its 'fifth round of capital projects' procedure in 2000.

It had hoped to build the multi-faith Asha Centre for leisure, education and community activity on a ten-acre site.

The Foundation said that the project was described in The Times in November 1999 as 'the country's first museum of immigration' in which the Foundation had persuaded Muslims, Jews, Hindus and Christians to 'bury their differences in support of the Centre which will teach about their history and beliefs'.

However, the judge, backing the Millennium Commission's decision said: 'I must make it clear that my decision involves no findings on the merits of the project. The merits of the project are self-evident. At issue in the competition were not its merits, but its comparative merits with those of the other applicants.'

Speaking after the verdict, the Asha Foundation said they were 'disappointed' and 'actively considering mounting an appeal'.


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.