Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
New legal advice for the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities vindicates Unison's arguments that all staff shou...
New legal advice for the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities vindicates Unison's arguments that all staff should have been transferred to unitary authorities with their pay and conditions intact, the union claimed this week.

Dan Brown, head of personnel strategy at Cosla, admitted that the legal opinion, obtained from Jim Peoples QC, contradicted Cosla's previous advice that detriment regulations be applied as a temporary protection to staff suffering pay cuts resulting from reorganisation.

'We would say that this latest opinion could suggest that some staff, not all staff, might have expected some permanent protection in terms of safeguarding their pay at the time of reorganisation,' Mr Brown said.

Staff who suffered pay cuts despite transferring to the same job at a new authority, for example, could have a good case at a industrial tribunal, Mr Peoples advised.

Unison said this week that the advice was a complete vindication of its own stance. It is in the process of registering several hundred industrial tribunal cases across Scotland to test its own legal opinion, obtained from Andrew Hardie QC.

'Unison believes the only way forward is for the employers now to reinstate staff to their proper terms and conditions at the point of transfer on 1 April 1996,' head of local government Mark Irvine wrote to all Scottish Unison branches.

'If the employers are prepared to take this action, Unison will obviously be willing to discuss the matter through the Scottish negotiating machinery in the hope of achieving a settlement without reference to the courts.'

According to Cosla, there are more than 1,000 people in Scotland thought to be affected by the detriment regulations. However, this included those who applied for a job and were then given detriment and those who were doing a different job and receiving detriment payments.

'The opinion does not suggest that these staff should have been transferred on existing terms and conditions,' Mr Brown said.

Cosla is currently holding a series of meetings with member authorities in the hopes of coming to an agreed all- Scotland solution. The employers' side and staff side secretariats were also due to meet this week for informal talks.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.