Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

EAST DORSET DC'S FOODS SAFETY AND HEALTH SERVICE 'GOOD' BUT HAS 'UNCERTAIN PROSPECTS'

  • Comment
The Food Safety and Health & Safety Service provided by East Dorset DC provide a good service but the prospect of i...
The Food Safety and Health & Safety Service provided by East Dorset DC provide a good service but the prospect of improvement is uncertain, according to an independent report released today by the Audit Commission.

An inspection team gave the service two stars* because the service has clear and challenging aims which link to corporate priorities. It achieves its aims through a comprehensive service provision with priority given to users needs. The Service is clear about its statutory duties and these are broadened by discretionary functions to provide a comprehensive service to the local community.

Jane Wreford, director, Southern Region Inspection Service said:

'The service has addressed issues that have been highlighted by the review, it plans and monitors its work and is supported by a good management information system but it is not clear how it will achieve best 25 per cent performance. The Service has a number of good practices that need to be shared with the public and this will be addressed through the council's web pages and a council newspaper.'

The inspection report highlights a number of key strengths:

- The service often works in partnership with public and private organisations to achieve its aims;

- It has a number of initiatives directed at the local community

- It delivers its responsibilities through enforcement, inspection, investigation, education, training and community projects and by offering advice to users

However, inspectors also found weaknesses:

- The service does not promote what it does or how well it performs

- The take up of education, training and information leaflets is poor

- The service is not clear how it will achieve best 25 percent performance

To help the service improve, inspectors made a number of recommendations, including:

- Making communication more effective

- Ensuring the level of service provision meets users perception by obtaining service users views through regular consultation

- Ensuring it meets local demands by using information in its possession to shape service planning

The Food Safety and Health and Safety Service has a budget of£266,000 for 2001/02 and has 5.65 full-time equivelent staff. The review covereed areas of responsibility in premises inspection; food complaints; food sampling; investigation of food poisioning incidents; investigation of accidents; safety advisor roles and responsibilities; training and community events.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.