Launched days ahead of the expected debate about the level of voter turnout in the elections on 10 June, the Charter argues that the key answer to improving public services and re-engaging voters is to found by building on councils' strengths of local knowledge, ability to join up local public services and accountability. This requires a new settlement in the relationship between central and local government.
*Local authorities should raise at least 50 per cent of their revenue locally by transferring taxes from Whitehall.
*Reform for a fairer council tax that better reflects the ability to pay and regional house price variations.
*Local authorities to have the lead role in co-ordinating local public services.
*Councils freed to innovate with different ways of devolving power to their communities.
*Increasing the talent base of councillors through better career pathways and remuneration.
*Councillors represented in a reformed House of Lords to scrutinise relations between central and local government.
Dennis Reed, LGIU chief executive, said: 'This Charter brings together much of the work that the LGIU has been doing to form a wide-ranging set of ideas to take local democracy forward and deliver more responsive local services.
'The LGIU has no wish to get involved in the ideological differences between the political parties or to diminish the choice offered to voters. We are promoting local democracy and localist thinking across the political spectrum. Our focus is the significant fault line that runs through all the parties between instinctive centralisers and localisers.
'We are encouraging the parties to recognise that the old centralised ap proach of 'Whitehall knows best' is a recipe for failure in the modern world and to see strong local government as an ally in improving local services, building strong communities and combating voter apathy.
'The LGIU is setting out a policy agenda that builds on the strengths of local government, such as its local knowledge, its ability to join up local public services and its accountability. We believe this is a more positive agenda than finding more ways to marginalise local government through central interference, the already faltering idea of having single purpose elected boards running public services and talk of further weakening the role of local councillors by, for example, cutting their numbers.
'We will be promoting the Charter through the summer and the party conference season and I hope that a broad range of people will sign up to its main points and argue for them within their parties. '
1.A summary version of the Charter for a New Era in Local Governancefollows:
The Local Government Information Unit
A Charter for a New Era in Local Governance
There must be a new relationship between local and central government to ensure that local public services work together better. This debate will be central at the next General Election. In our complex society the issues that affect people's lives require more than excellent individual services: they need joined up solutions that recognise choice and diversity. Central planning will never achieve this. More local freedom that builds on unique strengths in local government, such as local knowledge and democratic accountability, is the way forward. This Charter describes the national reforms that are needed to develop these strengths and create stronger communities in a new era of local democracy.
The local government finance regime is over-complex, unsustainable, unbalanced and gives councillors little scope for pursuing local priorities.
*The balance of council funding raise d locally must be increased to over 50% from the current 25%. This should eventually come through a package of new local tax options, such as a local income tax or a land value tax, and not through further centralisation in such areas as education funding.
*More immediately, certain existing taxes should be transferred from Whitehall to local councils. The business rate (NNDR) should be localised, with safeguards to prevent large and sudden increases in business rate bills. There should be a fairer balance between contributions from local business and residents.
*A reformed council tax should be related more to the ability to pay and take account of regional house price variation.
*Obstructions that mean councillors are more accountable to Whitehall than local electors must be removed. Capping should be abolished and, apart from time-limited pilot schemes, the ring fencing of grants should end.
*There should be independent audit of the cost of any new duties placed on local government prior to enactment to ensure that the duties are fully funded.
Local Community Leadership
Finance reform will end the destructive arguments of the past. The new challenge is to lead communities by joining up services and re-engaging with citizens. Councils need to be freed to grow into their natural role of leading and co-ordinating all local public services and advancing the well-being of their communities.
*Council scrutiny and overview powers already apply beyond council services to health. They should be extended to all public service bodies within their locality. Non-elected local public services should have a duty to participate in and facilitate scrutiny by elected councils.
*Local Public Service Agreements (LPSAs) should be developed to empower councils to make agreements with other local public services, pooling resources to deliver improvement. In return, those participating would be freed from some national targets.
*A balanced approach to joining up services requires common standards fo r all providers. Council tenants should expect investment and a common set of tenants rights to be available whatever model of social landlord they choose to run their housing. Council-owned companies should have the same access to investment as any other company. As in Scotland, all public agencies should be required to participate in developing community plans.
*A leaner national audit and inspection regime should reflect local priorities and councils should be allowed to experiment with the use of public satisfaction surveys as alternatives to national assessment regimes.
*As the local government family builds a culture of excellence there should be more collective self-regulation within local government to replace national inspection.
The ballot box gives local councils legitimacy in making tough choices. Decisions should be made as locally as possible to encourage engagement, beyond merely voting. Reforms that will enable more engagement from local communities include:
*Many councils have pioneered new forms of neighbourhood governance and participation. Additional powers are needed to pilot different forms of governance at both authority-wide and neighbourhood level.
*If Whitehall legislates for new centrally conceived neighbourhood governance structures, councils should have the right to recommend alternative models for their area. Where this happens both options should be voted on in a referendum. No model should be imposed on communities from the centre.
More people of all ages and backgrounds will volunteer as councillors if they were to be equipped to meet the demands of the job in today's world.
*Councillors need adequate remuneration, including paid time off from work with compensation for their employers, reimbursement for care costs and entry to council pension schemes.
*There should be more resources for training and council experience should be recognised in accredited qualifications in public service leadership and related skills.
*Pol itical restrictions, based on salary levels, on local government staff should be removed, except for designated senior officer posts.
Democratic reforms can contribute to greater electoral involvement, including:
*Votes at 16 and candidacy at 18; the extension of new forms of voting, once successfully piloted, as well as different times and places for voting; and powers for councils to pilot proportional representation in local elections.
We propose a stronger connection between the local, the regional, the national and the international to reflect a world that is becoming both more global and more local.
*A Local Democracy Act could set a new relationship between different levels of government.
*The powers of any elected regional assemblies should come from central government and quangos, not local councils, to enable them to make a difference.
*Any European Constitution should ensure consultation with local government before regulations are proposed that will affect councils.
*To change the balance of political power at the national level, a reformed House of Lords should include members elected by councillors across the UK.