Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A development company that hopes to build up to 1,500 homes on land north of Northampton has triumphed in a high co...
A development company that hopes to build up to 1,500 homes on land north of Northampton has triumphed in a high court challenge to a government strategy for the area that effectively blocked the scheme.

Top planning judge Mr Justice Sullivan has quashed parts of the Milton Keynes and South Midlands Sub Regional Strategy, published last March by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

The judge, sitting at London's high court, backed a legal challenge by local developer Ensign Group over a miscalculation in the strategy that led to the borough of Northampton being allocated 1,500 fewer homes.

The ODPM acknowledged the error during a high court hearing last week but lawyers contested the challenge on the basis that quashing parts of the strategy would result in a 'policy gap' for the area while a replacement strategy was produced.

However, the judge has ruled that, if the incorrect part were not quashed, it could be wrongly followed by the local council in planning decisions. The judge said it was open to deputy prime minister John Prescott to fill any gap by issuing a ministerial statement if he thinks it appropriate.

Earlier reports contemplated a 1,500-house development on a site near Northampton known as Buckton Fields or Whitehills, in which Ensign had an option to invest.

However, in the Milton Keynes and South Midlands sub-regional strategy, Mr Prescott misinterpreted a panel report conclusion that a further 1,500 houses should be provided in Daventry town centre. He thought it meant that those houses should replace the Buckton Fields allocation.

In a statement made following the ruling, the ODPM's legal counsel said: 'It has, at all times, been the first secretary of state's position that the panel's recommendations represent the most appropriate basis for the preparation of local development documents by the relevant planning authorities.

'It was not the first secretary of state's intention to change the housing number in the Northampton implementation area in a way that did not accord with the panel's intention.'

According to papers before the court, no development has yet taken place, and any proposals have yet to receive planning permission.


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.