Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Exclusive: Benefit claimants offered £6,500 to move out


Labour-run Brent LBC will offer 150 benefit recipients with large families a one-off payment of £6,500 to move out of the borough, under a proposed £1m ‘new start’ scheme for those hit hard by welfare cuts.

In exchange for the payment, participants must accept they will not qualify for temporary accommodation in the borough for two years should they decide to return.

The aim of the policy proposal is to help large families in Brent whose tenancies ‘cannot be sustained in the long term due to family size and circumstance,’ according to a paper outlining the authority’s proposals. The intention is to ‘to keep their family together and make a new start in a more affordable area,’ it adds.

‘New start’ is being funded through the the government’s £155m ‘discretionary housing payment’ budget, a hardship fund councils can use to mitigate potential harms of the government’s welfare cuts. The fund has been increased from £60m to help councils cope with the reforms.

LGC analysis of this year’s budget shows Brent received the largest single increase in Great Britain, a sign the authority is one of the hardest hit by the reforms. It was awarded £4.8m in 2013-14 compared with £1.6m the previous year.

DHP schemes has until now been largely employed by authorities to award temporary top ups to benefit recipients experiencing short-term financial difficulties.

However, councils appear to be introducing a range on new uses for the fund as they prepare for the full force of the welfare reforms to kick, including the controversial £26,000 annual benefit cap and the so-called ‘bedroom tax’.

Milton Keynes Council and Kirklees Metropolitan Council have also attached strings to discretionary housing payments under set circumstances. Both will only award DHPs to residents with debt if they agree to seek advice on how to manage their money.

Milton Keynes’ policy was amended last year ‘to ensure that those that are helped because of financial difficulties start to take more responsibility for their own finances’.

‘To facilitate this there is an expectation that customers take reasonable steps to help themselves by working with third party agencies such as CAB to improve their financial and budgeting arrangements,’ council paper state.

Under Kirklees policy, discretionary housing payments to residents in ‘multiple debt’ situations will only be awarded ‘once the customer has attended a meeting with a debt advice professional,’ according to council papers.

A spokesman for Brent said its 2013-14 scheme for discretionary housing payments had not yet been finalised. ‘To date it has only draft proposals for consultation,’ he added.

‘The council will be reviewing its final scheme in the light of comments received, and further evaluation of practical issues and legal responsibilities.

‘However, the introduction of the welfare reforms will result in hardship for a large number of claimants in Brent. For some of these people, a move to a more affordable part of the country may be their only option if they are unable to find work.

‘Therefore the use of DHP funds to help them to achieve this will directly help them to alleviate their hardship, while being more cost-efficient than paying DHP to maintain them in more expensive accommodation which is unsustainable in the long-term.’

‘The homeless duty would of course come back to Brent if the person became homeless again within two years,’ he added.

We hope you enjoyed the above article. To get unlimited access to all articles on you will need to have a paid subscription. Subscribe now to save yourself £100 off the standard subscription rate.



Readers' comments (2)

  • this isn't tackling a problem, it's just musical chairs...? i appreciate that it's not brent's job to worry about the fact that other councils will then have to pick up the tab but what legal recourse do you have if the family DO move back? you wouldn't be able to just leave children to starve on the street, merely because you have a signed document so you'd still end up picking up the tab. the money will still be spent, just by a different department and, i daresay, infinitely more. this will just become a job multiplier as the state is forced to pick up the pieces using several councils and many more departments to repair the new damaged.

    appreciate the attempt but it's really no different to coercive repatriation except to a different part of the uk so the problem isn't solved as the taxpayer still funds it all.

    the whole policy of council responsibility for the deprived is open to abuse (if that's what you can call it) but you either accept that society has a social obligation to support of a percentage of underclass or you don't... this is just gifting dysfunctional families with the opportunity to get into deeper trouble via free cash.

    and what is your legal position when the recipient council sues you for damages in this little act of benefit fiddling?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unintended consequences will rain down like bird droppings as indicated by Marino Katschmaryk. Do troublesome families figure here. Louise, any thing to say. Claimants who sign and take the Pickles 'shilling' could be declared as intentionally homeless and £6,500 wont buy many nights in a B&B hotel for a large family.
    In Brent they may say, "Mr Mayor, what shall we do with the unviable ones?" "Put them on a coach to Blackpool or may be Australia where they have had some experience of displaced ones". Come back Mrs Thatcher, all is forgiven, well almost all!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.