Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A high-achieving pupil expelled from school after she lashed at a teacher following a campaign of bullying yesterda...
A high-achieving pupil expelled from school after she lashed at a teacher following a campaign of bullying yesterday failed in an Appeal Court bid to be allowed back into mainstream education.

The teenager, who cannot be named for legal reasons and was referred to as 'C', is from the London Borough of Brent but went to school in nearby Barnet, London's Civil Appeal Court heard.

In July last year, after C had endured repeated bullying, she hit out at a teacher and was immediately excluded.

The London Borough of Brent has a policy that any child expelled from school is required to attend a pupil referral unit (PRU) in the aftermath of exclusion.

However she attended the centre only once before refusing to go back - finding it 'frightening and intimidating', her counsel, Ian Wise, told the Appeal Court.

Lady Justice Smith, sitting with Lord Justice Laws and the Master of the Rolls, Sir Anthony Clarke, refused to overturn an earlier High Court ruling in the council's favour.

She said Brent had fulfilled its legal obligations to the girl, but she also noted that the council had not communicated closely enough with C's parents.

The judge said the girl, who had received 'glowing' reports, had been 'severely bullied' during her time at school in Barnet. Teachers had described her as a 'pleasure to teach'.

Lawyers for the girl had claimed that the council had 'failed to provide her with suitable education' as required under the Education Act.

They claimed that the High Court judge who earlier dismissed C's judicial review challenge had 'erred in failing to have proper regard to the practical impediment of C attending the PRU'.

However, dismissing the appeal, Lady Justice Smith said the council had carried out its Education Act duties by offering C a place at the PRU.

But she added: 'However, we have considerable sympathy with the view of C and her parents. The council has never explained why it feels it can protect C at the PRU.

'If the council had recognised the sincerity of the family's concerns, and had been prepared to meet them for discussion, it is likely that this impasse would have been avoided.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.