Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Health secretary Alan Milburn's decision to give councils an extra£300m over three years to tackle delayed dischar...
Health secretary Alan Milburn's decision to give councils an extra£300m over three years to tackle delayed discharges has been criticised by the Local Government Association.

It said his move was 'clearly a response to the growing opposition of a fundamentally flawed unworkable bill'.

Mr Milburn plans to transfer£100m a year from the NHS to pay for the extra costs councils will face as a result of meeting their responsibilities under the Community Care (Delayed Discharges) Bill (LGC, 22 November).

The Department of Health said the figure was determined after calculations showed it was the maximum councils would have to pay hospitals if they failed to improve services for the long-term ill.

Mr Milburn said: 'My intention is not to punish local government but to pursue a real and sustained reduction in delayed discharge.'

But Alison King (Con), chair of the LGA's social affairs and health executive, said the LGA remained 'fundamentally opposed' to the prospect of councils being fined for delayed discharges set out in the bill.

She said: 'Clearly cash-strapped councils will use the£100m to tackle delayed discharges but, if they are fined, some or all of that money will be transferred back to the DoH. The system could become a costly, bureaucratic nightmare.'

She added: 'It is clear that Mr Milburn is obviously having second thoughts about his bill. If he truly does not want to punish councils, why does he not just simply scrap this ill-thought-out proposal? This£100m does little to help fund the already huge gap in councils' social services budgets.'

The Association of Directors of Social Services welcomed the extra cash.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.