Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Research by Zurich Municipal suggests that less than one per cent of LEA schools have requested to manage their own...
Research by Zurich Municipal suggests that less than one per cent of LEA schools have requested to manage their own insurance cover, with the majority retaining the valuable service provided by their Local Education Authority (LEA).

The fair funding regulations effective from April 1999, provide an option for schools to manage their own insurance cover. Research by Zurich Municipal has identified that to date only 190 LEA schools have requested to fund their own insurance, while 70 grant maintained schools have actually chosen to opt back into their LEA insurance services.

LEA schools represent around two hundred billion pounds worth of public assets. Earlier this year, Zurich Municipal wrote to 50,000 headteachers and chairs of governors, highlighting the significant risks associated with managing delegated insurance budgets and the benefits of LEAs retaining this responsibility.

These include:

* Schools managing their own insurance arrangements may find that any short term savings will be eroded by hidden costs. Schools will not only have to allocate resources to negotiating policy cover, but will also have responsibility for day to day administration including the first instance management of claims. Schools will also have to ensure they keep up to speed with the mass of new legislation and regulations which require action to ensure risks are minimised.

* Additional costs may also be incurred as a result of the LEA needing to retain some degree of cover for the school assets.

* Whilst some schools may be able to arrange cover on an individual basis, schools which are perceived by insurers to be a bad risk may find it difficult or even impossible to secure cover.

* In the event of a major incident, such as a school fire, the risk management and insurance function of a local authority co-ordinates the necessary support. Those schools who manage their own insurance will face all the responsibility for handling any such crisis.

* Schools are continuously facing new types of claims. Recent court cases have included new areas such as claims against schools for failing to recognise medical conditions such as dyslexia, stress cases brought by teachers, and compensation claims for the effects of bullying. Such claims may appear many years after an incident occurs.

Bill Walker, from Zurich Municipal said:

' The management of insurance by individual schools could increase the premiums collected by the insurance industry four fold. Despite this, at Zurich Municipal we feel strongly that this would be a retrograde step resulting in a decline in the quality of risk management in schools and, as a consequence, increased costs.

'Schools may be attracted to short term savings, but these can hide additional administration and longer term costs. Schools who are considering managing their own insurance must ensure that they are fully aware of these implications.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.