Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Districts fear for future after new homes bonus cut

  • Comment

District councils have warned they are “staring into the abyss” as a result of changes to the new homes bonus with serious questions over their future sustainability.

LGC analysis of government figures reveals 108 of the 201 districts in England face a reduction equivalent to 10% or more of their settlement funding, with 31 of those anticipating a reduction equivalent to 25% or more.

This follows changes announced by communities secretary Sajid Javid in December, and confirmed this week, which saw new homes bonus payments reduced from six years to five years in 2017-18, before reducing it further to four years in 2018-19. A 0.4% baseline growth target will also be introduced in 2017-18 which must be achieved before payments can be made.

Overall, there are 167 districts which are set to lose out as a result of the new homes bonus changes.

When combined, all of those districts are set to be £79m worse off in 2017-18 compared with what they had anticipated to receive under indicative figures published alongside last year’s four-year funding settlement.

This money will be redirected to provide funding for social care services.

According to the analysis the biggest losers were Basingstoke & Deane BC and Forest Heath DC, which would see a reduction in new homes bonus funding of of £2.5m and £1.4m respectively. This is equivalent to 69% and 54% respectively of their 2017-18 settlement funding made up of revenue support grant and local share of business rates. 

Forest Heath leader James Waters (Con) said the council’s investment plans would be affected. He added: “We have done everything over and above what the government has asked us – it is a blow and unhelpful.”

Terri Reid (Con), deputy leader of Basingstoke & Deane, said the council was prepared for the changes, adding: “We are in a better position than a lot of districts because we have other investments so we have some wriggle room in terms of balances.”

Ashfield DC’s new homes bonus funding is set to reduce by about £500,000 in 2017-18 compared with what the council was expecting. That is equivalent to 11% of its settlement funding for the year.

Deputy leader Dan Davis (Lab) told LGC the changes would result in the council losing 10% of its revenue over the next four years. He said: “It has really shifted the emphasis in the council from looking at savings to actually questioning what the council is there for.”

Cllr Davis added: “We have got to question whether we can set a budget over the coming years - we are now through the bone and into the marrow.”

South Somerset DC is preparing for a £800,000 reduction, equivalent to 10% of its settlement funding.

Finance portfolio holder Peter Seib (Lib Dem) said the council was “exposed” as the new homes bonus had been a valuable source of income. He added: “We are really worried about the future – it was a slap in the face and we are staring into the abyss.”

Chesterfield BC leader John Burrows (Lab) said a loss of £2.28m over five years would have a “disastrous impact” on services. He added: “It is not acceptable to leave councils facing those types of cuts without any warning, particularly as we have only recently signed a four-year budget settlement agreement that was supposed to give us medium-term certainty for our financial planning.”

The Department for Communities and Local Government has been contacted for comment.

CouncilPercentage reduction
Basingstoke & Deane BC -69%
Forest Heath DC -54%
South Cambridgeshire DC -50%
Elmbridge BC -50%
West Devon BC -45%
Watford BC -44%
Epsom & Ewell BC -43%
Maidstone BC -37%
Wycombe DC -36%
South Bucks DC -35%
*As s proportion of settlement funding 2017-18
  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.