Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Flint unveils new section 106

  • Comment

A levy to be imposed by planning authorities, replacing the current section 106 deals, has been unveiled by the planning minister Caroline Flint.

The government claims the new Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) could raise hundreds of millions of pounds per year while developers work within a transparent charging system published by planners.

Announcing the CIL, Ms Flint said it would "help communities thrive and give developers certainty".

"Almost all development creates some need for infrastructure and services so it is only right that development contributes a fair share alongside the billions of pounds of investment the government is putting in," she said.

"CIL will provide vital additional funding for the new infrastructure our communities need, helping them to grow in a sustainable way."

Section 106 agreements have a reputation for drawn-out negotiations and 52% of major new residential schemes do not include such agreements.

CIL will be discretionary for local authorities, which the government says will increase their flexibility to shape their communities and support growth.

The levy also promises greater certainty to industry because charges will be consulted on, independently examined, and published in a local charging schedule. Section 106 will be scaled back.

The move was welcomed by Cllr Paul Bettison, who chairs the Local Government Association Environment Board:

"Councils will be particularly pleased that the Minister has opted for a locally-led approach to funding infrastructure.

"Councils know their areas best and will now be able to work together to prioritise funding for infrastructure projects of benefit to more than one authority."

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.