Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

FLINTSHIRE FACES BILL FOR RETIREMENT COSTS ERROR

  • Comment
Flintshire CC members will have to decide how to deal with an error in the calculations for an employee's pension e...
Flintshire CC members will have to decide how to deal with an error in the calculations for an employee's pension entitlement, the costs of which could take 30 years to recover, reports The Daily Post (p14).

A report by chief executive Phillip McGreevy to this week's full council meeting reveals that an application for early reitrement fell outside the council's policy but was approved in error.

Officials are allowed to retire early in the interests of efficiency if the costs are recoverable in three years. But an employee of the library service applied to retire on 30 June and attached to the application were details of the costs of the retirement indicating recovery costs by the third financial year.

But that was based on the post being scrapped - when, in fact, the post was being retained at a lower grade. Due to a misunderstanding a member of the personnel department issued a letter of termination in error. Four days later it was discovered that in addition to the documentation being incomplete, the financial information it contained was incorrect.

The correct information indicated that the costs associated with the retirement would not be recoverable until 2028-29. Mr McGreevy said that as soon as the error was discovered, legal advice was sought and the employee was advised of the situation.

While the employee would not be able specifically to enforce the early retirement, he or she may sue for damages for breach of contract or unfair/constructive dismissal.

Mr McGreevy said that the council should review all the information and consider making a 'commercial decision', bearing in mind that the employee could lose a claim for damages or damages could be limited.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.