Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fuel Poverty: Improve housing

  • Comment
Newark & Sherwood DC has adopted a different approach to tackling fuel poverty focusing on houses rather than their occupiers.

“Back in 1985 our council housing was in crisis,” says David Pickles, the council’s sustainability manager. “Fifty percent of houses in Newark had mould and condensation. Doctors were reporting that people had health problems and tenants’ groups were threatening the council with litigation.”

In a dramatic move, the council suspended the updating of tenants’ kitchens and bathrooms and invested instead in making improvements to houses’ central heating and energy efficiency.

“We treat fuel poverty as a stock condition problem, not a social problem,” explains Mr Pickles. “Our strategy has been to ‘fuel poverty proof’ the housing stock to focus on which houses are not capable of delivering affordable warmth.”

The effects of the change in policy were dramatic, says Mr Pickles. In 1985, less than five percent of council houses provided affordable warmth to vulnerable households. Now the figure is nearer 80% and if it were not for recent energy price increases it would be nearer 100%.

See also: Council-wide commitment Proactive on issues

An annual survey sent to 10% of households gives the council a indication of who they should target and where to focus its help. During the last three years, for example, there has been a special programme for the elderly, in a joint project part-funded by Nottinghamshire CC .

“It has been easy making improvements to our own housing stock,” says Mr Pickles. “But we have had to cajole private occupiers to spend their own money or to make use of grants. And, despite holding seminars and trying to persuade them, private landlords have been hard to convince. They say there is no business case for energy-efficiency improvements, especially for low-income tenants, and don’t want to have to maintain central heating.”

Another frustration for the council is that it is unable to draw on other organisations’ data for targeting vulnerable households. The utility companies don’t share details of the households they provide support to, says Mr Pickles, and nor does central government, which collects details on Home Energy Certificates.

“A few years ago I would have been pretty cocky about our performance,” says Mr Pickles. “But we’re in a different world now. With ever-increasing energy prices we are having to scratch our heads as to how to deliver on fuel poverty.”

Further Information

Newark & Sherwood DC David Pickles, sustainable energy manager.

Tel: 01636 655 598 or email: David.Pickles@nsdc.info

See also in Best Practice

Have council-wide commitment

Be proactive in tackling issues

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.