Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

GATESHEAD IN HIGH COURT BID TO STOP WASTE INCINERATOR PLAN

  • Comment
Fearing for the impact on the local environment and public health, Gateshead BC is battling to thwart plans for con...
Fearing for the impact on the local environment and public health, Gateshead BC is battling to thwart plans for construction of a clinical waste incinerator. In London's High Court today the Council claimed the Secretary of State for the Environment reached a decision which no reasonable Minister could have reached when he gave the incinerator the green light.

In doing so he departed from the 'short, unequivocal and clear' recommendations of his own planning inspector, the Council's barrister, Mr David Steel QC, told the High Court.

The Northumbrian Water Group Plc appealed to the Inspector against the Borough's refusal of planning permission for construction of the incinerator at Felling Sewage Treatment Works, Follingsby Lane, Wardley, Gateshead, the court heard.

The proposed incinerator would have a 40 metre high stack and was one of the options open to the Northern Regional Health Authority for disposal of some 8,000 tonnes of clinical waste a year. The Inspector rejected the Northumbrian Water Group's appeal after a local inquiry, finding that the proposed development was 'not acceptable in a semi-rural area', said Mr Steel.

But on May 24 this year, the Secretary of State went against his own Inspector's recommendations and granted outline planning permission for the scheme, Mr Steel told the High Court. Gateshead and other local authorities were entitled to know the basis of the Government's policy on whether environmental issues should be dealt with at the planning stage or by the Pollution Inspectorate at the authorisation stage, Mr Steel said.

In his decision letter the Secretary of State said arguments made by the 'Residents Against Incineration' Group (RAIN) had been fully taken into account. But there was a clear need for clinical waste incineration facilities and the nearest residential area was about one kilometre away from the proposed plant.

Sunderland's appeal against the Secretary of State's decision continues and is expected to last about two days.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.