Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

GOVERNMENT TO 'NAME AND SHAME' ONE IN SIX LEAs OVER SPENDING

  • Comment
Councils that have failed to pass on the 6% increase in the national education budget to benefit children in school...
Councils that have failed to pass on the 6% increase in the national education budget to benefit children in schools will be 'named and shamed' by the government, according to The Guardian (p12).

David Blunkett, the education secretary, said yesterday that he would take a 'robust' line against councils that have 'siphoned off' part of the extra£1.1bn which was targeted at education this year.

The councils will be asked to explain why they have not given sufficient priority to schools, and if they are deemed to have spent to much on running town hall education bureaucracy, they will be ordered to dispense more money to schools next year.

But opposition parties accused Mr Blunkett of trying to hoodwink voters by witholding the names of the offending councils until after the local elections next month.

'He is telling them to vote Labour, but a few days later he will be slagging off Labour councils for failing to spend as he wishes,' said Don Foster, the Liberal Democrat education spokesman.

Mr Blunkett said he wrote to 18 authorities last month to complain that they were not increasing their education budgets by as much as they were allowed.

A party source said the councils were Brent, Bristol, Cambridgeshire, Cumbria, Dorset, Hackney, Hertfordshire, Lancashire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Norfolk, North Somerset, Redbridge, South Gloucestershire, Walsall, Waltham Forest, West Sussex and Wiltshire. Most are Labour-led or have no party in overall control.

Five responded by increasing their education spending, but the source said other authorities are being identified as underspenders as the government receives fuller information on 1999-2000 budgets. It was likely that one in six of the 150 education authorities would be on the eventual list of offenders.

The Labour spokesman said councils would be criticised regardless of which party was in control. He said he was 'not aware' of any Labour authourities facing elections next month that were facing criticism from ministers in June.

Graham Lane, the Local Government Association's chair of education, said: 'We are used to being on the receiving end of misleading statistics, but these figures are downright lies. Government findings show that more than two-thirds of LEAs are spending well in excess of their education targets.'

Neil Fletcher, the LGA's head of education, said: 'The overwhelming majority of new money has gone straight to schools or is being spent on services such as pre-school education, special needs, literacy, adult education and the youth service.

'Cash is alsp spent on LEA-wide initiatives such as education action zones, the new IT Grid for Learning and paying for extra teachers as a result of rising school rolls.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.