Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

HIGH COURT QUASHES GOVERNMENT PLANNING INSPECTOR'S DECISION

  • Comment
A decision by a government planning inspector to refuse permission for a housing development was quashed in the Hig...
A decision by a government planning inspector to refuse permission for a housing development was quashed in the High Court in London yesterday.

The court has ordered deputy prime minister John Prescott, as the ultimate head of planning, to have the matter reconsidered.

Developer WE Black was refused permission to build 12 new houses on the cleared site of a former health club in the centre of Amersham.

Deputy George Bartlett QC backed the developer's claim, that the inspector was wrong to refuse permission in order to safeguard the provision of sporting facilities in the area, ruling that since the health club was demolished, the sporting facilities on the land had already been 'lost'.

He said it was not enough that a planning permission was in place for a replacement facility, and backed WE Black's claim that there appeared to be no prospect of a new facility actually being implemented, and that there was no provision for sporting facilities on the site in the area's local plan.

He said: 'It is of course important to bear in mind that the purpose of planning policies is to prevent the loss of facilities. But it is impossible, in my judgment, to treat them as preventing development where the facilities have already been lost.

'What takes the circumstances of this case outside the range of circumstances to which these policies could reasonably be held to apply is that the recreational or sports facility consisted entirely in the use of a building that has now been demolished.'

Chesham-based Black purchased the site in order to pursue the development, which would include two, three and four bedroom houses. Chiltern District Council refused permission, Black then appealed, but the planning inspector who heard their case also rejected the scheme.

In May 2004, the council refused planning permission for 15 houses on the other half of the sub-divided site, which is owned by Anduff Holdings Ltd.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.