Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Whether an attention-seeker or much-loved aunt, the NHS needs to be told some home truths

  • 1 Comment

A guest briefing from New Local Government Network director Adam Lent

How should we regard the NHS as it celebrates its 70th year? A much-loved elderly aunt who offers nothing but care and support to an increasingly demanding family despite being rather down on her financial luck? Or something more like the septuagenarian occupant of the White House: an over-fed attention seeker who constantly disrupts any attempt at rational conversation?

Judging by yesterday’s performance at the parliamentary liaison committee, the prime minister clearly favours the more affectionate portrayal. The early birthday present Theresa May offered up was the promise of more money as part of a multi-year funding settlement. The NHS won’t even have to wait until the 2019 spending review to get the cash. Coming on top of the new pay deal for staff, it is turning out to be a very special year for the health service.

The prime minister is, of course, right that the NHS is facing rapidly growing levels of demand. She is also right that funding for the health service has not kept pace with that demand. But any even-handed survey of the public sector immediately reveals that this is hardly a unique situation.

As councils know only too well, rising demand is a fact of life affecting not just adult social care but also children’s services. The pressure on schools, police and welfare are growing. Councils are even having to deal with more demand for environmental services as incidents of fly-tipping rocket. Add to this the fact that the Department of Health & Social Care is the only major spending department to have enjoyed a funding increase since 2010 and other public sector workers may well be concluding that the NHS bears a closer resemblance to an amber billionaire than a kindly aunt.

So why does the NHS get singled out for this special attention from policy-makers? Simply, because it is the NHS. It is the “national religion”, the “world’s greatest institution”, staffed by “angels” and “heroes”.

There are no votes to be lost in giving it more money. But this adulation erodes rational policy-making and ultimately damages the very health service politicians are seeking to help.

The NHS is an organisation primarily focused on acute care and responding to incidence of illness. The rise in demand for its services cannot be solved by simply throwing more money at meeting that demand. To do so is rather like reasoning that the best treatment for alcoholism is to make sure the alcoholic has enough money to buy whisky.

Ultimately, the solution to rising demand in the NHS and in all other services is to fund prevention and early help. That means thinking far more holistically about a decent, long-term settlement for public health, social care, welfare and children’s services alongside the NHS. It also means making a serious investment in shifting all public services towards preventative rather than curative models.

Whether the prime minister and her cabinet would ever consider embracing this common sense is a moot point in the face of NHS idolatry. But as many families know there comes a point when a troublesome relative, no matter how loved and elderly, can benefit from a couple of home truths.

By Adam Lent, New Local Government Network director. Twitter: @adamjlent

 

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • I largely agree with the core thrust of the article, but I don't think the answer is to begrudge the NHS its funding. I think the answer is to demand better treatment for our 'Cinderella' local government services, better funding and better integration of services. All services. As important as health and social care is to avoiding illness, so is meat inspection and housing and transport and waste management and trading standards and education and libraries and all the other frontline services councils provide and the back offices that support those front services and keep them running.

    Personally I think a good first step towards that would be a single public sector pay scale that everyone in the public sector is on. Everyone; that includes MPs, Councillors and Chief Execs. No exceptions. Whether you're a Squaddy in a fox hole of some foreign field, the MP that voted to put them there, the Cleaner who empties the MP's bin, the Nurse who will care for the Squaddy's injuries or the local government officer who makes sure that their family is kept safe and well then you are somewhere on that scale. Then if the MPs want to cap the staff's pay at 1% they have to accept 1% themselves, if they want to give themselves 11% then they have to give everyone else in the public sector 11% as well.

    Level that playing field and level the rest as well.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.