Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The Chartered Institute of Housing is calling for greater clarity throughout the lengthy and much-amended Housing B...
The Chartered Institute of Housing is calling for greater clarity throughout the lengthy and much-amended Housing Bill as it makes slow and rocky progress through its parliamentary committee stages.

In particular the CIH, while supporting the principle, is concerned that the power in the bill afforded to housing association tenants to buy their homes could endanger Section 106 agreements.

Section 106 agreements allow land to pass from councils to housing associations at knock-down prices, on condition that properties will be provided for rent. The CIH fears that agreements could be discouraged by the idea that rented homes could be sold off.

CIH chief executive Christine Laird said: 'It is right that housing association tenants should enjoy the same rights as council tenants, but guarantees on land availability to housing associations need to be secure to enable more tenants to enjoy those rights in the long term.'

The institute also wants further clarification on the duty of local authorities to allocate permanent accommodation to those in housing need.

The department of environment - in response to correspondence from Ms Laird - has confirmed that households in need and already registered on council waiting lists could be offered long-term social housing under new homelessness legislation. As a result, councils will be able to allocate permanent accommodation to homeless families who have 'nearly enough points for an offer of suitable accommodation'. The CIH is now pressing for a systematic approach to allocation policies.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.