Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The government has admitted confusing Kingston upon Hull (above) with Kingston upon Thames (left) in its deprivatio...
The government has admitted confusing Kingston upon Hull (above) with Kingston upon Thames (left) in its deprivation index for councils.

The gaffe has incensed Hull City Council which says it could have affected its bid for cash from the £100 million single regeneration budget, losing it millions of pounds.

'If I'd made the same mistake I would have shot myself by now,' said Hull deputy leader Ken Branson. He described it as an 'astonishing' error.

The mistake was made in the calculation of the index published in May. According to the DoE, two figures for education attainment and the level of long-term employment were transposed. As a result Hull was ranked 56 in the original index out of 366 councils in England when it should have been ranked 31. The most deprived council area has a ranking of one. Kingston upon Thames was ranked 124 when it should have been ranked 169.

A spokesman for the DoE admitted the mistake could have influenced Hull's bid for regeneration funding but stressed it was only one criterion used and no decision had been made on the false index. The department blamed the Centre for Urban Policy Studies in Manchester, which compiled the index.

Hull has failed to win any funding from the last two city challenge rounds, despite being hit hard by industrial decline and the collapse of North Sea fishing. 'My gut feeling is that we would have lost out and that we would not have had any recourse,' said Mr Branson. 'If local government had done the same thing we would have been hung drawn and quartered.'

Mr Branson suggested that the DoE might have spotted the mistake itself if it had a few more northerners working in Whitehall.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.